ElectroNeek

Industries · CPA & Accounting

The staff you can't hire, replaced by agents you don't manage

The accountant shortage is structural, not cyclical. Client-accounting practices know their numbers — and the numbers say the document work has to stop being manual.

Team and partners across North America, Latin America, Europe and Asia · support in English and Spanish · annual commitment, flexible payment plans

Client Books Agent · run #3,377

Running

Client invoice batch received

14 PDFs · client portal + inbox sweep

✓

Coded per client rules

GL mapping · class · location

✓

Posted to QuickBooks

client book #23 · source attached

✓

Continuous reconciliation

bank feed matched · 2 items open

✓

possible double-billing caught

human
This month, client AP12 min per invoice → 1 min review

In one paragraph

ElectroNeek automates CPA-firm and client-accounting work by reading client documents with AI, posting coded transactions into QuickBooks, NetSuite, Xero and practice systems, and reconciling continuously instead of at close. Firms typically reclaim 30–50% of back-office effort — capacity they cannot hire.

Systems we reach — and what we do in each

Through the API where there is one, through a bot on screen where there isn’t. All 700+ integrations →

QuickBooks

  • —Bills entered from PDFs — Desktop by bot, Online by API
  • —Bank feeds reconciled with agent-proposed matches
  • —Client statements generated monthly

NetSuite

  • —Supplier invoices posted with PO match
  • —Journal entries from spreadsheets with approval

Xero

  • —Receipts from email and WhatsApp coded and attached
  • —Overdue invoices chased by email

Sage Intacct

  • —Vendor bills with dimensions from the invoice text
  • —Month-end reports exported and distributed

Bill.com

  • —Approvals requested in Slack before payment runs
  • —Vendor onboarding documents collected and checked

CCH Axcess

  • —Client documents filed by type and tax year
  • —Engagement tasks created from intake forms

Thomson Reuters UltraTax

  • —Source documents organized before preparation
  • —Status pulled into the client tracker

Where it hurts — we’ve seen it before

Client AP/AR & reconciliations

Processing and reconciling across dozens of client books — done by staff accountants you can no longer hire.

Tax-season intake

Thousands of client PDFs sorted, classified, and keyed by hand — every spring, on deadline.

1099 / W-9 season & month-end close

Predictable crunches that burn the same weeks every year across every client.

Client AP / ARReconciliationsTax document intake1099 / W-9 processingMonth-end close prep

Client AP, automated

Today, by hand

  • — Client invoices arrive across inboxes and portals
  • — Staff key them into each client's books
  • — Reconciliations lag behind close
  • — Errors surface at month-end

With the agent

  • ✓ Agent reads every client inbox and portal
  • ✓ Codes and posts to the right books
  • ✓ Reconciles continuously, not at close
  • ✓ Your CPAs review exceptions only

The math on a typical operation

Volume

40 client books · ~900 invoices / month

By hand

≈ 12 min per invoice — intake, coding, posting

With agents

≈ 1 min of review on flagged items only

≈ 165 staff-hours per month — a hire you no longer need to make.

Illustrative benchmark for a typical operation of this profile — your tailored case runs these numbers on your data.

Built for: Managing partners, COOs and CFOs, CAS practice leaders, firm administrators.

CPA & Accounting: questions we hear first

Can client AP processing be automated across dozens of books?

Yes. Agents read invoices from every client inbox and portal, code them per client rules, post to the right books in QuickBooks, Xero or NetSuite, and reconcile continuously — your CPAs review exceptions only.

How do firms handle tax-season document intake with AI?

Agents classify and extract data from client PDFs as they arrive — W-2s, 1099s, K-1s, statements — sort them to the right client file, and flag missing documents, turning the spring pile into a managed queue.

Is this worth it for a 40–200 person firm?

That's exactly the profile where it pays fastest: enough volume to hurt, staff roles that stay unfilled for months, and ROI-literate partners. Typical first-year returns run 2–3× on automated processes.

Four lines from you. A tailored case from us.

Name the process, tell us what happens today, list the systems, and say where it hurts most. We dig into what you actually run and come back with the case — on your data, with the planning math and its assumptions. If a process doesn’t pay back, we say so before the sandbox, not after.