ElectroNeek

Industries · Construction subs

Pay apps, lien waivers, and RFIs — assembled while you build

Electrical, mechanical, HVAC, and plumbing subs on commercial projects drown in a paperwork stack that scales faster than the crews: pay applications, lien waivers, submittals, RFIs, COIs.

Team and partners across North America, Latin America, Europe and Asia · support in English and Spanish · annual commitment, flexible payment plans

Pay App Agent · run #412

Running

Billing data pulled

Sage 300 CRE · job 2214 · SOV current

✓

G702/G703 assembled

continuity checked line-by-line

✓

Lien waivers generated

conditional · matching amounts

✓

Filed to GC portal

Textura · backup attached

✓

0.5% off SOV — confirm before submit

human
This billing month, per GC6 hours → 45 min of review

In one paragraph

ElectroNeek automates subcontractor paperwork by assembling AIA G702/G703 pay applications, generating lien waivers, maintaining submittal and RFI logs across GC portals like Procore and Textura, and tracking COIs — so billing month stops consuming the office. Subs typically cut pay-app assembly time by 70%+.

Systems we reach — and what we do in each

Through the API where there is one, through a bot on screen where there isn’t. All 700+ integrations →

Procore

  • —Submittal and RFI logs kept current
  • —Daily logs summarized for the PM

Textura

  • —Pay applications uploaded with lien waivers
  • —Payment status checked and reported

GCPay

  • —G702/G703 figures entered from the billing sheet
  • —Waivers generated and attached

Sage 300 CRE

  • —Job costs pulled for the monthly billing
  • —Vendor invoices coded to cost codes

Foundation

  • —Certified payroll reports prepared
  • —AP invoices entered from email

AIA G702/G703

  • —Pay applications assembled from the schedule of values
  • —Retainage checked before submission

Where it hurts — we’ve seen it before

Monthly pay applications

G702/G703 packages, lien waivers, and backup for every line — assembled by hand, every month, for every GC.

Submittal & RFI logs

Maintained manually across each GC's portal — double entry with a deadline attached.

COI & compliance tracking

Certificates for your own subs and compliance docs for every GC — an expiration-date minefield.

Pay apps (G702 / G703)Lien waiversSubmittals & RFIsCOI trackingGC portal filings

Pay-application month, automated

Today, by hand

  • — Billing assembles G702/703 by hand
  • — Lien waivers chased over email
  • — Backup docs collected from every PM
  • — One package per GC, every month

With the agent

  • ✓ Agent assembles the package from project records
  • ✓ Generates waivers and collects signatures
  • ✓ Files to each GC's portal
  • ✓ Your team reviews and approves

The math on a typical operation

Volume

12 GCs · monthly pay applications

By hand

≈ 6 hours per GC per month assembling G702/703 + waivers

With agents

≈ 45 min of review per GC

≈ 60 office-hours per billing month — and no missed portal deadlines.

Illustrative benchmark for a typical operation of this profile — your tailored case runs these numbers on your data.

Built for: Owners and presidents, CFOs and controllers, project executives, office managers.

Construction subs: questions we hear first

Can pay application assembly be automated?

Yes. Agents pull billing data from your accounting system, assemble G702/G703 packages with schedule-of-values continuity, generate the matching lien waivers, attach backup, and file to each GC's portal — Procore, Textura, GCPay — for your review.

How does COI tracking work with agents?

Agents read certificates as they arrive, extract coverage and expiration data, track compliance for your own subs and every GC requirement, and chase renewals before they lapse — an expiration-date minefield handled continuously.

Do agents work across different GC portals?

Yes — that's the point. Each GC demands its own portal and format; agents maintain submittal and RFI logs across all of them from your single source of record, eliminating the double entry.

Four lines from you. A tailored case from us.

Name the process, tell us what happens today, list the systems, and say where it hurts most. We dig into what you actually run and come back with the case — on your data, with the planning math and its assumptions. If a process doesn’t pay back, we say so before the sandbox, not after.