Industries · Logistics & 3PL
Every load is a paper trail. It doesn't have to be manual.
Freight brokerages, asset-light 3PLs, and customs brokers run thin margins on high transaction volume — and every transaction drags a stack of documents behind it.
Team and partners across North America, Latin America, Europe and Asia · support in English and Spanish · annual commitment, flexible payment plans
Freight Docs Agent · run #6,540
POD received
load #88412 · driver photo upload
Matched to load in McLeod
carrier · lane · delivery confirmed
Lumper receipt validated
$175 · within contract terms
Billing file completed
invoice queued same-day
Rate mismatch → ops review
detention charge unconfirmed
In one paragraph
ElectroNeek automates freight document work by reading BOLs, PODs, carrier packets and customs paperwork with AI, matching them to loads in TMS platforms like McLeod, Turvo and Revenova, and flagging missing documents same-day. Brokerages typically cut document-to-invoice lag from days to hours.
Systems we reach — and what we do in each
Through the API where there is one, through a bot on screen where there isn’t. All 700+ integrations →
McLeod
- —POD and BOL data posted to the load
- —Carrier invoices matched to rate confirmations
- —Status updates written from carrier emails
Turvo
- —Shipment updates from carrier portals
- —Exceptions flagged to the dispatcher in Teams
Revenova
- —Loads created from emailed tenders
- —Invoicing triggered when the POD arrives
project44
- —Tracking events reconciled against the TMS
- —Late shipments escalated to the customer team
OpenInvoice
- —Field tickets and invoices submitted by a bot
- —Rejections read and corrected before resubmission
CBP ACE portal
- —Entry data entered on screen by a bot
- —Status checked twice a day, changes posted to Slack
Where it hurts — we’ve seen it before
Document intake into the TMS
Carrier setup packets, BOLs, PODs, and lumper receipts arrive as PDFs and get keyed into the TMS by hand.
Track-and-trace overhead
Status emails and check calls eat ops headcount that should be moving freight, not chasing it.
Customs entries & ISF paperwork
Deadline-driven, detail-heavy, and still manual — one missed field is a held shipment.
POD-to-invoice, automated
Today, by hand
- — PODs arrive by email in every format
- — Ops keys them against loads in the TMS
- — Billing waits on missing paperwork
- — DSO stretches while documents chase loads
With the agent
- ✓ Agent reads and matches PODs to loads
- ✓ Posts clean records to the TMS
- ✓ Flags missing or mismatched docs same-day
- ✓ Billing runs on complete files
The math on a typical operation
Volume
600 loads / month
By hand
≈ 15 min per load of document chasing and TMS entry
With agents
≈ 90 seconds of exception handling per load
≈ 135 ops-hours back per month — and billing runs days earlier.
Illustrative benchmark for a typical operation of this profile — your tailored case runs these numbers on your data.
Built for: Owners and presidents, COOs and CFOs, VPs of operations, carrier and customer ops leads.
UBTS — Singapore logistics on ElectroNeek →Processes we build for Logistics & 3PL — written as they run
Each one says which systems are involved, what the agent, the document step and the bot each do, what to connect, a planning estimate with its assumptions, and the limits.
Systems without an API
A web portal without an API, scraped to Sheets on a schedule — with change alerts
Any web portal (Studio web automation) · Google Sheets / AW Tables · Slack / Teams
Read the use case →Documents and finance
A folder of scanned PDFs becomes one Excel sheet, every night
SharePoint / OneDrive / Google Drive / SFTP · IntelliDocs · Excel 365 / Google Sheets
Read the use case →Documents and finance
Supplier invoices into NetSuite or QuickBooks Online — no manual entry
Outlook / Gmail · IntelliDocs · NetSuite · QuickBooks Online · Xero · Siigo · Alegra
Read the use case →Logistics & 3PL: questions we hear first
Can POD processing into a TMS be automated?
Yes. An agent reads proof-of-delivery documents in any format, matches them to loads in McLeod, Turvo or your TMS of record, posts clean records, and flags mismatches — so billing runs on complete files instead of chasing paperwork.
How does automation reduce DSO for freight brokers?
The document lag is the DSO: invoices wait on PODs and rate confirmations. Same-day document matching and validation moves billing days earlier per load, which compounds across hundreds of weekly loads.
Does this work for customs brokers?
Yes — customs entries and ISF filings are deadline-driven document processes: agents assemble entry data from commercial invoices and packing lists, validate codes, and prepare filings for licensed brokers to review and submit.
Four lines from you. A tailored case from us.
Name the process, tell us what happens today, list the systems, and say where it hurts most. We dig into what you actually run and come back with the case — on your data, with the planning math and its assumptions. If a process doesn’t pay back, we say so before the sandbox, not after.