Automations · ACORD forms → your AMS
Submission intake without the rekeying — ACORD to AMS, automatically
Median payback on agent deployments: 5.1 months
Submission Agent · run #1,208
New submission received
ACORD 125 + loss runs · from producer inbox
ACORD fields extracted
insured · lines · limits · carrier history
Loss runs summarized
3 carriers · 5-year history normalized
Posted to Applied Epic
client record updated · docs attached
Missing COI → producer notified
waiting on carrier document
In one paragraph
ElectroNeek agents automate insurance submission intake: they read ACORD forms and loss runs arriving in producer inboxes, extract insured, lines, limits, and carrier history, summarize loss runs across carriers, and post everything into agency management systems like Applied Epic, AMS360, or HawkSoft — flagging missing documents to producers. Intake that took ~45 minutes per submission becomes ~4 minutes of exception review.
The math on a typical operation
Volume
120 submissions / month
By hand
≈ 45 min each — intake, rekeying, loss-run summary
With agents
≈ 4 min of exception review each
≈ 80 producer-hours returned per month on intake alone — before renewals.
Illustrative benchmark — your tailored case runs these numbers on your data.
Questions buyers ask
Can ACORD forms be read automatically, including scans?
Yes — ACORD 125/126/140 and the rest, whether they arrive as clean PDFs, scans, or photos. The agent extracts the fields, validates against client records, and posts to the AMS; producers see exceptions only.
How are loss runs handled across different carriers?
Each carrier formats loss runs differently; the agent normalizes them into one summary — years, claims, incurred amounts — and attaches it to the submission record, ready for the marketing round.
Does this work at renewal volume?
That's exactly when it pays: renewal season doubles intake without doubling staff. Agents scale to the pile; your team's review time stays flat.