Automations · Pay apps → every GC portal
G702/G703 packages assembled and filed — every GC, every month
Median payback on agent deployments: 5.1 months
Pay App Agent · run #412
Billing data pulled
Sage 300 CRE · job 2214 · SOV current
G702/G703 assembled
continuity checked line-by-line
Lien waivers generated
conditional · matching amounts
Filed to GC portal
Textura · backup attached
Retainage variance → controller
0.5% off SOV — confirm before submit
In one paragraph
ElectroNeek agents automate construction pay applications: they pull billing data from Sage 300 CRE or Foundation, assemble AIA G702/G703 packages with schedule-of-values continuity checked line by line, generate matching lien waivers, attach backup, and file to each GC's portal — Procore, Textura, GCPay. What took ~6 office-hours per GC per month becomes ~45 minutes of review.
The math on a typical operation
Volume
12 GCs · monthly pay applications
By hand
≈ 6 hours per GC per month assembling G702/703 + waivers
With agents
≈ 45 min of review per GC
≈ 60 office-hours per billing month — and no missed portal deadlines.
Illustrative benchmark — your tailored case runs these numbers on your data.
Questions buyers ask
Can pay application assembly really be automated?
Yes — it's document assembly with rules: SOV continuity, retainage math, waiver amounts matching billed amounts. Agents do the assembly and checking; your controller reviews and approves before anything is submitted.
Does it work across different GC portals?
That's the point. Each GC demands its own portal and format; the agent files to all of them from your single source of record — no more double entry per GC.
What about lien waivers?
Generated automatically to match each pay app — conditional or unconditional, with amounts tied to the billing — and routed for signature. The waiver chase stops being a month-end scramble.